Compare verified models
Choose a category, then compare manufacturer-sourced data
HeavyEQ presents imperial values first while keeping metric references, standards, rating bases and configuration notes attached to every comparison row.
Configuration-sensitive comparison: reference configurations and measurement bases remain visible. Differences in basis should not be read as performance differences.
| Specification | Caterpillar 320 Excavator | John Deere 210 P-Tier Excavator |
|---|---|---|
| Net engine power | 172 hp128.5 kWISO 9249 · Manufacturer-published reference configuration | 157 hp117 kWManufacturer-published net output |
| Shipping length | 31 ft 3 in9,530 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 31 ft 8 in9.66 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
| Transport width | 9 ft 9 in2,980 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 9 ft 10 in2.99 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
| Shipping height — top of cab | 9 ft 9 in2,960 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 9 ft 11 in3.01 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
| Maximum digging depth | 22 ft 0 in6,720 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 21 ft 11 in6.67 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
| Maximum reach at ground level | 32 ft 4 in9,860 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 32 ft 0 in9.75 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
| Maximum cutting height | 30 ft 9 in9,370 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 32 ft 11 in10.04 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
| Maximum loading height | 21 ft 4 in6,490 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 23 ft 7 in7.18 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
| Tail-swing radius | 9 ft 3 in2,830 mmReach 5.7 m boom, Reach 2.9 m stick, 1.19 m³ bucket; 600 mm shoes for transport width. | 9 ft 6 in2.89 m2.91 m arm, standard boom and counterweight, 600 mm triple semi-grouser shoes; less bucket where the brochure states. |
Curated comparisons
Permanent comparison guides
These small, intentional pages explain the rating basis and leave unavailable values blank.Caterpillar 320 Excavator vs Komatsu PC210LC-11 Excavator
Shortlist these excavators around the trench, truck and lift tasks you actually perform, then compare the documented boom, arm, shoes and counterweight.
ExploreTakeuchi TB260 Mini Excavator vs Kubota U55-5 Mini Excavator
An access and handling comparison for compact excavation, with tail clearance, trailer loading and attachment setup kept visible.
ExploreBobcat E35 Mini Excavator vs Caterpillar 303.5 CR Mini Excavator
Compare compact digging access and controllability using the exact E35 and 303.5 CR records, rather than blending neighboring generations.
ExploreCaterpillar 255 Compact Track Loader vs Bobcat T66-2 Compact Track Loader
Compare track-loader handling, hydraulic setup and transport readiness while preserving the capacity rating basis.
ExploreBobcat T76 Compact Track Loader vs Kubota SVL95-2s Compact Track Loader
A used-machine comparison of the documented T76 and prior-generation SVL95-2s, focused on condition and equipment rather than current-model substitutions.
ExploreCaterpillar D3 Dozer vs John Deere 650 P-Tier Dozer
Evaluate smaller dozers through blade configuration, finish control and undercarriage cost, using the actual machine builds.
ExploreCaterpillar D5 Dozer vs Komatsu D51PXi-24 Dozer
A configuration-sensitive dozer shortlist: assess blade work, machine-control equipment and mobilization before interpreting the headline figures.
ExploreJCB 3CX Backhoe Loader vs CASE 580SV Construction King Backhoe Loader
Compare both ends of the backhoe: loader handling and excavating geometry, with dipper, stabilizer and regional configurations explicit.
ExploreJLG 1055 Telehandler vs Genie GTH-1056 Telehandler
Build this shortlist around load weight, placement height and horizontal reach; maximum capacity alone cannot answer the lift question.
ExploreCaterpillar 926 Wheel Loader vs Volvo L90H Wheel Loader
Compare these loader candidates by material, bucket and truck geometry, with tipping-load basis and configuration retained.
ExploreCaterpillar 320 vs John Deere 210 P-Tier
Compare the complete digging and loading configuration before treating either excavator as a substitute for the other.
ExploreCaterpillar 255 vs Kubota SVL75-3
Build a compact-track-loader shortlist around the load, working attachment and site access.
ExploreCaterpillar 950 vs Komatsu WA380-8
Compare loader linkage and bucket packages against the material and receiving truck.
ExploreCaterpillar 260 vs Bobcat S66-2
Compare these skid-steer references around the intended lift task and installed tool package.
ExploreCaterpillar 140 vs Komatsu GD655-7
Keep grader blade, control and traction arrangements visible when comparing the two references.
ExploreCaterpillar 420 XE vs John Deere 310 P-Tier
Compare the backhoe and loader ends separately before choosing a complete site machine.
ExploreCaterpillar TH1055 vs JLG 1055
Compare these telehandlers using the actual placement task and the applicable attachment load chart.
ExploreCaterpillar 730 vs 730 EJ: tipping or ejector body
Choose the discharge system around the receiving area, material and return cycle, then compare the exact chassis and body package.
ExploreCaterpillar 730 vs 735: matching the haul cycle
Compare loader matching, haul-road access and the loaded cycle before choosing the larger truck.
ExploreCaterpillar 770 vs 777: haul-truck scale and site fit
A fleet-sizing comparison that keeps body, loading height and haul-road requirements visible.
ExploreCaterpillar 953 vs 963: crawler-loader working package
Compare access, bucket configuration and the digging-to-loading cycle, with coupler differences kept explicit.
ExploreCaterpillar 834 vs 844: wheel-dozer scale and blade fit
Compare the pushing task and blade package before treating machine size as an advantage.
ExploreCaterpillar 621 vs 623: open-bowl or elevating scraper
Compare loading method, material behavior and support equipment while preserving unresolved configuration dimensions.
ExploreCaterpillar PL83 vs Volvo PL4809E: sideboom or rotating pipelayer
Compare machine architecture, lift planning and transport preparation; this is not a substitute for a lift chart.
ExploreCaterpillar 816 vs 836: landfill compactor work area and package
Compare working-face access, blade setup and compaction-wheel condition at the scale of the operation.
ExploreCaterpillar AP500 vs AP555: wheeled or tracked paving package
Compare undercarriage, screed and site movement as one paving package.
ExploreWirtgen W 35 Ri vs W 50 Ri: access and millings handling
Compare a standard conveyor-free compact mill with a rear-conveyor package, including the material-handling plan.
ExploreKleemann MCO 90i EVO2 vs MR 110i EVO2: cone or impact process
Choose the crushing stage and material process before comparing the plant footprints.
ExploreMcCloskey J40 vs Kleemann MC 110i EVO2: primary jaw-plant fit
Compare feed preparation, receiving equipment and transport arrangements for two jaw-plant candidates.
ExploreMcCloskey 621 vs Doppstadt SM 620.3: trommel package and site layout
Compare drum screening and conveyor arrangements with the intended material, output and mobilization.
ExploreVermeer RTX450 vs T655III: utility trenching or pipeline-scale package
A task-scale comparison that keeps tractor, chain-trencher and rockwheel measurements separate.
ExploreDitch Witch JT20 vs AT32: conventional or dual-rod HDD package
Compare drilling-system architecture, rod package and site support before ranking pullback force.
ExploreJohn Deere 1910G vs Tigercat 620H: forwarding or skidding system
Compare two timber-extraction methods as parts of a harvesting system, not interchangeable carriers.
ExploreManitou M 30-4 vs JCB 940: mast selection and load placement
Compare the exact mast and residual-capacity plate, with the JCB transport gaps kept visible.
ExploreSennebogen 830 E crawler vs 840 E stationary: mobile reach or fixed installation
Compare relocation needs with a fixed electric handling system, including project-specific engineering.
ExploreWirtgen SP 25i vs SP 64i: slipform configuration and paving task
Compare the intended profile or slab, mould package and worksite logistics before selecting the carrier.
ExploreCaterpillar 815 vs CS56B: tamping-foot machine or vibratory drum
Select compaction equipment from the material and project specification, then compare the complete working package.
Explore