Verified model comparison

Caterpillar 255 vs Kubota SVL75-3

Build a compact-track-loader shortlist around the load, working attachment and site access.

Check the handling task

Use the rated-capacity basis and attachment weight together. Fork work, bucket work and powered attachment work place different demands on a loader. Do not treat an operating-weight difference as an equivalent change in allowable payload.

Confirm the supplied hydraulic package

Identify the installed auxiliary package and its controls on each machine. Compare the intended attachment manual with that package, then include cooling, electrical and hose requirements in the supplier check. A flow value in a reference sheet is not confirmation of a used machine’s build.

Price tracks and the working kit

Request a track and roller assessment and inspect lift-arm, coupler and cylinder wear. Compare the complete package with the same working tools and transport plan. Cab preference matters, but it should be assessed alongside access, visibility and the work the buyer repeats most often.

Questions that decide the shortlist

  • Check the handling task — what exact configuration is offered?
  • Which missing records or inspection findings would change the delivered cost?
  • Can the seller demonstrate the required task with the supplied equipment?
Caterpillar 255 Compact Track LoaderCurrent 255 product pageUnited States / North American reference
Kubota SVL75-3 Compact Track LoaderSVL75-3Canada reference

Generation/configuration-aware: measurement basis and reference configuration travel with each value. A difference in basis is not treated as a performance difference.

Caterpillar 255 vs Kubota SVL75-3 manufacturer-published specifications
SpecificationCaterpillar 255 Compact Track LoaderKubota SVL75-3 Compact Track Loader
Rated operating capacity (35% tipping load)2,499 lb1,133 kg35% of tipping load2,490 lb1,129 kg35% of tipping load
Operating capacity (50% tipping load)3,570 lb1,619 kg50% of tipping load3,557 lb1,613 kg50% of tipping load
Tipping load7,140 lb3,238 kgManufacturer reference configurationNot published in this research record
Lift breakout force5,895 lbf2,674 kgfManufacturer product pageNot published in this research record
Length — with bucket on ground11 ft 3 in3,430 mm320 mm bar-tread tracks and published bucket-on-ground reference configuration.Not published in this research record
Vehicle width — 320 mm tracks5 ft 5.9 in1,675 mm320 mm bar-tread tracks and published bucket-on-ground reference configuration.Not published in this research record
Height — top of cab6 ft 11.3 in2,115 mm320 mm bar-tread tracks and published bucket-on-ground reference configuration.Not published in this research record
Bucket pin height — maximum lift10 ft 4 in3,150 mm320 mm bar-tread tracks and published bucket-on-ground reference configuration.Not published in this research record
Reach at maximum lift and dump1 ft 9.3 in540 mm320 mm bar-tread tracks and published bucket-on-ground reference configuration.Not published in this research record
Clearance at maximum lift and dump7 ft 11.4 in2,424 mm320 mm bar-tread tracks and published bucket-on-ground reference configuration.Not published in this research record
Ground clearance8.3 in212 mm320 mm bar-tread tracks and published bucket-on-ground reference configuration.Not published in this research record
Gross engine powerNot published in this research record74.3 hp55.4 kWAt 2,400 rpm
Operating weightNot published in this research record9,420 lb4,273 kgClosed-cab published configuration
Auxiliary hydraulic flowNot published in this research record19.2 / 29.8 US gpm72.7 / 112.8 L/minStandard / high flow

No winner is declared. Job fit depends on configuration, condition, dealer support, attachments, transport and cost assumptions beyond these published figures.