Public research content · marketplace inventory remains in prototype

Verified model comparison

Caterpillar 950 vs Komatsu WA380-8

A mid-size wheel loader comparison focused on published power, operating-weight and bucket ranges without inventing a winner.

Caterpillar 950 vs Komatsu WA380-8 manufacturer-published specifications
SpecificationCaterpillar 950 Wheel LoaderKomatsu WA380-8 Wheel Loader
Engine power (ISO 14396)186 kW249 hpISO 14396:2002 · At 2,100 rpmNot published in this research record
Operating weight19,260 kg42,461 lbManufacturer reference configurationNot published in this research record
Full-turn static tipping load11,961 kg26,369 lbManufacturer reference configurationNot published in this research record
Breakout force181 kN40,690 lbfManufacturer reference configurationNot published in this research record
Bucket-capacity range2.67–9.90 m³3.5–13.0 yd³Published application range2.7–3.3 m³3.5–4.3 yd³Published range
Net engine powerNot published in this research record143 kW191 hpISO 9249 / SAE J1349 · At 2,100 rpm
Operating-weight rangeNot published in this research record18,385–19,020 kg40,532–41,932 lbPublished configuration range

No winner is declared. Job fit depends on configuration, condition, dealer support, attachments, transport and cost assumptions beyond these published figures.